Prediction of Tyler Pham vs Jacob Brumm Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
T. Pham vs J. Brumm

Tyler Pham

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

687

Best Rank

607

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Jacob Brumm

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

687

Best Rank

607

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Pham 1 - 0 Brumm

They have played 2 sets in total, with Tyler Pham winning 2 and Jacob Brumm winning 0. The last match between Tyler Pham and Jacob Brumm was at the USA F25, 23-09-2013, Round: Pre-Q, Surface: Hard, with Tyler Pham getting the victory 6-2 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Pham	1
Brumm	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Pre-Q) USA F25(09-23-13)

Stats

Tyler Pham

Jacob Brumm

T. Pham vs J. Brumm H2H Profile

T. Pham	Stats	J. Brumm
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
62.50% (5-3)	Career Total W/L	51.15% (156-149)
1	Hard	0
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

T. Pham vs J. Brumm Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tyler Pham has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Jacob Brumm has won 43.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tyler Pham, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Jacob Brumm has won 42.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 26.56% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Tyler Pham has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jacob Brumm has saved 54.95% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Tyler Pham has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Jacob Brumm winning 48.28% (W/L 28/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Tyler Pham has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 5/3), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 5/3). Jacob Brumm has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 127/114), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 28% (W/L 5/13).
Player level: In the last year, Tyler Pham has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Jacob Brumm has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 47.83% of matches (W/L 22/24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tyler Pham winning 1 times and Jacob Brumm being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tyler Pham winning 2 and Jacob Brumm winning 0.
The last match between Tyler Pham and Jacob Brumm was at the USA F25, 23-09-2013, Round: Pre-Q, Surface: Hard, with Tyler Pham getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tyler Pham has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Jacob Brumm has played against players with an average rank of 299.07.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tyler Pham has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jacob Brumm has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Tyler Pham has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jacob Brumm has converted 36.36% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Tyler Pham vs Jacob Brumm Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

T. Pham vs J. Brumm H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

T. Pham	Stats	J. Brumm
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	4
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

T. Pham Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
USA F26 - 22-09-2014
Pre-Q Antonio MassaraA. Massara	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Q2 Brian BattistoneB. Battistone	L	6-0 6-7(7) 7-6(5)	Stats
Q1 Austin RappA. Rapp	W	2-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
USA F25 - 23-09-2013
Pre-Q Jacob BrummJ. Brumm	W	6-2 6-2	Stats
Q1 Matt FawcettM. Fawcett	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

J. Brumm Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Champaign Challenger - 10-11-2025
Q3 Ryan FishbackR. Fishback	L	6-2 3-0 ret.	Stats
Q1 Drew Van OrderlainD. Van	W	7-6(0) 6-4	Stats
Sioux Falls Challenger - 20-10-2025
Q1 Andrew FentyA. Fenty	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Fairfield Challenger - 06-10-2025
Q3 Edward WinterE. Winter	L	6-4 6-0	Stats
Q1 Unknown PlayerU. Player	W	3-6 6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

T. Pham vs J. Brumm Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

T. Pham	Stats	J. Brumm
62.50% (5/3)	YTD Win/Loss	51.15% (156/149)
61.11% (11/7)	Sets Win/Loss	51.76% (353/329)
52.44% (86/78)	Games Win/Loss	51.42% (3196/3020)
62.50% (5/3)	Hard Win/Loss	52.70% (127/114)
0% (0/0)	Clay Win/Loss	52.17% (24/22)
0% (0/0)	Indoor Hard W/L	27.78% (5/13)
0	Aces Per Game	0.16
0	Aces Total	487
0	Double Faults Per Game	0.2
0	Total Double Faults	610
1st Match	Average Match Time	1:15:36
387.38	Average Opponent Rank	337.77
0% (0/0)	1st Serve %	59% (7721/13125)
0% (0/0)	1st Serve Win %	65% (5049/7721)
0% (0/0)	2nd Serve Win %	48% (2619/5404)
0% (0/0)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (567/1309)
0% (0/0)	Return Points Win %	40% (5278/13148)
0% (0/0)	Challenger W/L	33.33% (10/20)
62.50% (5/3)	Futures W/L	53.09% (146/129)
63% (5/8)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	52% (155/298)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/4)
33% (1/3)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	64% (35/55)
50% (1/2)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (33/71)
100% (4/4)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (160/138)
0% (4/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (160/22)
25% (4/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	12% (145/18)